07. Quiz: Interpreting Coefficients in MLR
Interpreting Coefficients Attached to Quantitative Variables
We are now moving into material that combines math, code, and the real world. It is important to make sure we have all of the basics down before we jump into coding problems.
QUIZ QUESTION::
Consider we are predicting the price of a stock based on the accounting information of a company. Drag the type of each variable next to the variable name.
ANSWER CHOICES:
Name |
Type |
---|---|
Number of Employees |
|
Country Location of Headquarters |
|
Industry of the Company |
|
Price of All Assets |
SOLUTION:
Name |
Type |
---|---|
Country Location of Headquarters |
|
Industry of the Company |
|
Country Location of Headquarters |
|
Industry of the Company |
|
Number of Employees |
|
Price of All Assets |
|
Country Location of Headquarters |
|
Industry of the Company |
|
Number of Employees |
|
Price of All Assets |
|
Number of Employees |
|
Price of All Assets |
|
Country Location of Headquarters |
|
Industry of the Company |
|
Number of Employees |
|
Price of All Assets |
Now imagineā¦
We build a linear model using the above four aspects to predict the stock price of each company, which variables can you add based on what you have learned so far?
SOLUTION:
- Number of Employees
- Price of All Assets
Now imagineā¦
We fit a multiple linear regression model using the x_1, number of employees, and the x_2, price of all assets, to predict y, the price of the stock.
We obtain a linear model of the form:
\hat{y} = b_0 + b_1x_1 + b_2x_2
where:
- b_0 = -3.20
- b_1 = 0.60
- b_2 = 0.24
Use this information to answer the quiz questions below.
SOLUTION:
- If a company has no employees and no assets, we predict they have a stock price of -3.20.
- For each additional employee a company adds, we predict an increase in stock price by 0.60 if the amount in assets remains the same.
- For each unit increase in assets, we predict an increase in stock price by 0.24 if the number of employees stays constant.
- We could continue to add variables to this model, and the interpretation of these coefficients would basically stay the same, but we would add more variables to the "held constant" portion of the interpretation.